问题描述：
英语翻译
In the SAC,Apple asserts
(1) trademark infringement,false designation or origin,and false description,under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act,15U.S.C.§ 1125(a);
(2) dilution,under § 43 (c) of the Lanham Act,15 U.S.C.§ 1125(c);
(3) common law trademark infringement;
(4) dilution under California Business &Professions Code § 14247 and common law; (5) false advertising under § 43(a) of theLanham Act,15 U.S.C.§ 1125(a);
(6) unfair competition under California Business &Professions Code § 17200.
In the SAC,Apple asserts
(1) trademark infringement,false designation or origin,and false description,under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act,15U.S.C.§ 1125(a);
(2) dilution,under § 43 (c) of the Lanham Act,15 U.S.C.§ 1125(c);
(3) common law trademark infringement;
(4) dilution under California Business &Professions Code § 14247 and common law; (5) false advertising under § 43(a) of theLanham Act,15 U.S.C.§ 1125(a);
(6) unfair competition under California Business &Professions Code § 17200.
问题解答：
我来补答展开全文阅读